I used to think of free schools as "unschooling schools," which Wendy Priesnitz of Life Learning Magazine refers to as an oxymoron in her post, "The Dark Side of Influence."
Although someone might suppose an unschooling parent in an area that boasts at least two such "free schools" would know more about them, I had thus far felt sufficiently content with unschooling from home, so I hadn't looked elsewhere. That is, until the other day after reading the same Lenz on Learning post, "Unschooling vs. Sudbury schooling," to which Wendy Priesnitz had referred.
Upon reading the glowing review of Sudbury free schools, I initially felt excited by the possibility of my children taking part in a free school community, perhaps a day or two a week. What great people they would meet, right? I went straight to the nearest Sudbury school's website and started reading. However, whereas Wendy Priesnitz already knew about the "dark side" of Sudbury, it came as a surprise to me--Compulsory full-time attendance. Huh? How is that free?
And so I quit reading the school's website. In her post, Wendy elaborated on the coercive "pseudo-democracy" practiced in these schools and the ominous concept of freeing children from parental influence. I've heard enough to know that it doesn't jive with my family's lifestyle and I can now leave behind any ideas I might have had about a free school somehow providing a better unschooling environment than my homemade version.
Besides, if my kids were at school every day playing democracy with other kids, we wouldn't be hanging together at the lake on a beautiful day or taking a spontaneous trip. They would be cut off from our world of surprises and possibilities.











6 comments: